Saturday, August 30, 2025

LA DA Hochman Opposes Overturning Menendez Brothers’ Convictions

Share

Los Angeles’ recently elected District Attorney, Nathan Hochman, announced on Friday that he has formally requested the court to deny the Menendez brothers’ petition for a new trial. This development follows an assertion made by former DA George Gascon months earlier, which cited new evidence—a letter indicating the potential abuse the brothers allegedly suffered at the hands of their father—as grounds for reconsideration.

Hochman raised significant concerns regarding the validity of the evidence, contending that it fails to meet the stringent criteria necessary for a retrial. He remarked, “We reassessed the credibility of the letters, specifically the purported 1988 correspondence from Erik Menendez to Andy Cano, and found it riddled with inconsistencies that cast doubt on its authenticity.” This letter, allegedly penned eight months before the murders of their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, outlines claims of sexual abuse.

Hochman emphasized that even if the letter’s authenticity were to be established, its late introduction—nearly three decades after the fact—would render it inadmissible. He critiqued the delay in presenting this evidence, noting that calls for a new trial were not raised until an extended period had passed.

The Menendez brothers, convicted in 1996 for the 1989 killings, have faced renewed scrutiny regarding their claims of trauma and abuse. Their family expressed profound disappointment in Hochman’s decision, arguing that it reopens old wounds and undermines the psychological impacts of their historical abuse. They condemned Hochman’s assertions, labeling them as not only unjust but also dangerous, as they perpetuate harmful narratives surrounding survivors of abuse.

The family remains hopeful that Judge Jesic will impartially assess the evidence in light of contemporary understandings of trauma, as they continue to advocate for justice and healing from a decades-long ordeal.


Vocabulary List:

  1. Reconsideration /ˌriː.kənˌsɪd.ərˈeɪ.ʃən/ (noun): The action of thinking about something again especially to reconsider a decision.
  2. Credibility /ˌkrɛd.ɪˈbɪl.ɪ.ti/ (noun): The quality of being trusted and believed in.
  3. Authenticity /ɔːˌθɛnˈtɪs.ɪ.ti/ (noun): The quality of being genuine or real.
  4. Inadmissible /ˌɪn.ədˈmɪs.ə.bəl/ (adjective): Not allowed or accepted particularly in a legal context.
  5. Profound /prəˈfaʊnd/ (adjective): Having deep insight or understanding; intense.
  6. Advocate /ˈæd.və.keɪt/ (verb): To publicly support or recommend a particular cause or policy.

How much do you know?

Who is the recently elected District Attorney of Los Angeles?
Nathan Hochman
George Gascon
Jose Menendez
Andy Cano
What was cited as grounds for reconsideration in the Menendez brothers’ case?
Financial fraud
Abuse from their father
Involvement in a drug cartel
Political corruption
When were the Menendez brothers convicted for the killings of their parents?
1990
1996
2001
2010
What did Hochman criticize about the letter from Erik Menendez to Andy Cano?
Its length
Its handwriting
Its inconsistencies
Its language
Who is expected to impartially assess the evidence in the Menendez brothers’ case?
George Gascon
Nathan Hochman
Judge Jesic
Andy Cano
What was the main reason Hochman cited for requesting the denial of a new trial for the Menendez brothers?
Authenticity of evidence
Length of the trial
Judicial bias
Public opinion
The letter from Erik Menendez to Andy Cano was written after the murders of their parents.
Calls for a new trial were immediately raised after the evidence of abuse came to light.
The Menendez family supported Hochman’s decision to deny the new trial petition.
The Menendez brothers were convicted for the killings in 1989.
Judge Jesic is hoped to consider modern views on trauma in the case.
The Menendez brothers’ case involves claims of trauma and abuse.
Nathan Hochman raised concerns about the validity of the evidence, stating it fails to meet the criteria necessary for a retrial. He found inconsistencies in the purported 1988 correspondence from Erik Menendez to Andy Cano, nearly eight months before the murders of their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez. This case led to the Menendez brothers being convicted in .
The delayed introduction of the letter from Erik Menendez to Andy Cano would render it inadmissible due to the extended period that had passed. The calls for a new trial were not raised until after the fact.
The Menendez brothers’ family expressed disappointment in Hochman’s decision, criticizing that it undermines the psychological impacts of their historical .
The family hopes that Judge Jesic will impartially assess the evidence in light of contemporary understandings of .
The Menendez brothers’ claims of trauma and abuse have faced renewed scrutiny following the assertion made by former DA months earlier.
The Menendez brothers were potentially abused at the hands of their .
This question is required

Read more

Local News