Lo and behold, researchers have discovered that the weathering of organic carbon intensified the warming initiated by volcanic carbon dioxide (CO2), resulting in greater temperature increases than if only volcanic CO2 had been released. This finding is significant as it challenges existing perceptions of climate mechanisms.
Bob Hilton explains that weathering processes contributed additional CO2 to the atmosphere, enhancing global warming. However, his colleague, Rugenstein, questions the extent of this carbon release. He finds the current estimates implausibly high and asserts that such carbon fluxes may not be as significant as proposed.
This raises critical questions about Earth’s climate regulatory system, commonly referred to as the climate “thermostat.” Traditionally, it was believed that the weathering of silicate minerals acts as a buffer, reducing atmospheric CO2 and preventing extreme warming. Hilton acknowledges that silicate weathering remains vital but indicates that it must become increasingly effective to counter the potential impacts of organic carbon weathering. Rugenstein concurs that while organic carbon weathering could serve as a substantial positive feedback mechanism, it highlights the need for an even stronger silicate weathering response.
The competition between these two weathering processes hinges on the availability of organic-carbon-rich sediment exposed on land. Rugenstein warns that this supply is finite; once depleted, the capacity for significant carbon oxidation diminishes, constraining the feedback strength. In contrast, silicate minerals are abundant and thus offer a more robust feedback mechanism for CO2 reduction.
The research implies that the findings may apply to current climate change events, suggesting that organic carbon weathering might contribute to atmospheric CO2 levels over the coming centuries. Hilton envisions a gradual additional CO2 release that could slightly exacerbate current human-induced warming, affecting our carbon budget without leading to immediate catastrophic consequences.
Test Your Understanding
How much do you know?





